At universities across the United States, cuts in federal research funding are threatening to slow the pace of scientific progress. The diminishing budget has been a growing concern for biomedical scientists because the federal government provides nearly two-thirds of funding for science and engineering research, including life sciences research… This essay first explains the ability of the companies to invest abundantly in these efforts as compared to the government, followed by how competition among private companies can ascertain their success in these efforts. Yesterday I took part in a Policy Lab at the Royal Society, on the theme The public nature of science – Why and how should governments fund basic research? Sample Answer 2: Some believe that a government should build more railroads rather than … Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. When asked to weigh the necessity of government as opposed to private investment in research funding, 61% of adults say government funding is essential to ensure that enough scientific progress is made while 34% say that private funding would be enough even without government funding. SoO funds research that advances our fundamental understanding of how organizations … 6. Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. It is argued that the government ought to take responsibility for the financial and management control of scientific research rather than private institutions. Support for … With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. While these estimates vary wildly, the most common for both national and EU investment are around 20% a year - far higher than stock, bond or … Write at least 250 words. To begin with, scientific research works are often expensive and may not … Personally I think a third of all scientific research should be privately funded, rather than a third of all scientific research being publicly funded--the percentages should be reversed. Scientific research is expanding worldwide and more people are participating in this area. For example, due to the increasing competition among the large cellphone companies, we have so many mobile devices in the market these days with different features and capabilities. But a new study finds turning to industry partners taints perceptions of university research, and including other kinds of partners doesn't really help. And anyway, research and development funding is a handout to friends of the current party in power. When the funding … We allocate our funds to things like war and a police state, but we short change science constantly. However, the topic on its source of funding from either the government or private companies has always been debatable. With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why the State has an upper hand in this regard.... Scientific research plays an important role in the advancement of any nation, and requires a lump sum amount to conduct the various investigation trials. The main reason is that the scope of scientific research is diverse and wide, and private companies could cover up some research which is not carried out by the governments. Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organisations. The US has a model where both parties fund scientific research — the federal government usually around basic research that may or may not have commercial implications, and companies focusing on applied research that directly could lead to new products or services. For example, a recent survey in Denmark noted that the productivity of the private companies in the research field is higher than the state solely due to the amount of spending done by each party. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. All the services are free for Premium users. The common belief is that research grant funding comes from Therefore, it is very crucial as to how the tax payer's hard earned money spent for the progress of the nation, funding scientific research is generally a costly and time consuming affairs, as compared to investment in commercial organization which yields higher returns on investment. Those who are not in favour of governments being in charge of research argue against it for several … In my view, the government should take the responsibility of handling and funding all the research projects rather than the commercial organizations.... Book: The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+. The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore some people think that the government should provide financial support. This essay disagrees with this premise because the autonomous institutes have a better chance of success in this endeavour. But cutting out private companies would be a bad idea. The ministry is overwhelmed with other focus areas which prevents them for accomplishing the same level of success. ... Second, governmnet invests not only in science but also in many public services, which indicated that the fund for carrying the research is not enough. In their opinion, only scientific research should be funded, rather than … Additionally, some cancer foundations are making a profit off of donations, but if we continue to use federal funds for cancer research then we may find a cure sooner than a for-profit organization would, and the money may be used more responsibly. I responded to a presentation by Professor Helga Nowotny, the Vice-President of the European Research Council, saying something like the following:. Strongly disagree. The country with the best technological and scientific advancements is the one who continues to lead the world. Unlike the political authorities, private firms have enough funds to contribute towards the research and development initiatives. Since organisations do not have these obligations, they can easily allocate a huge amount of fund towards inventions. I’m not saying that government-controlled research shouldn’t happen. Promoting scientific discovery and technological advancement while managing risks also argues for a clear government role. Economists have been trying for years to estimate the returns from public investment in research and innovation, around the world. I am absolutely in support of this notion because of its astronomical cost and public safety. Funding should be divided in a balanced way. Although governments have been providing funds and monitoring research, I agree that private organizations would play a better role. A lot of research wouldn't take place without the government I believe that there should be a shift in scientific research. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement? Government is going to research what it is palatable for government research. In conclusion, I believe that a government, either in a developed or a developing country, should invest to build a safer, faster and more reliable transportation system and the railway, for this reason, should get a priority. ... Government organization should cooperate with … AIDS cure and cancer treatment, rather than handing out funding for every research proposal. The ruling party of any nation has responsibilities like providing a better education system, improving the health of the public and ensuring the safety and the security of the country. ), companies doing research and development, and non-profit foundations (e.g., the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, etc. Get more back. The government should increase the budgets for education and take it away from the arts. Without government support, most basic scientific research will never happen. Businesses tend to underinvest in scientific research because it is a public good, so governments use patents, innovation prizes, R&D tax credits, and direct funding of R&D through grants to promote scientific research. The Science of Organizations (SoO) program funds basic research that yields a scientific evidence base for improving the design and emergence, development and deployment, and management and ultimate effectiveness of organizations of all kinds. Scientific research plays a very important role in the progress of a nation. Most scientific research is funded by government grants (e.g., from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, etc. To what extent do you agree or disagree? On one hand, it is true that scientific research should not be only conducted by the government. A recent Pew survey highlights a disturbing disconnect: while a majority of Americans support federally funded research, many also distrust science—especially when it comes to … Submit an unlimited number of essays. State funding helped get Google’s search algorithm, antibody cancer therapies, and DNA sequencing technologies off the ground. Write at least 250 words. Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. This essay first explains the ability of the companies to invest abundantly in these efforts as compared to the government, followed by how competition among private companies can ascertain their success in these efforts.... Scientific research plays vital role in the progress of the nation. And there's no way around it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? My apologies to Helga, but my comments are going to be rather … These objectives are totally arguable by anyone that scientific research should be helmed by national authority rather than commercial organisations. In summary, the scientific experimentations can be best performed by the privately-owned firms due to the high availability of monetary resources and the sense of finishing first in the race of innovations. ). ... the government should have the predominant responsibility for this. To what extent do you agree? It is argued that research should be controlled and funded by the government, and not private organisations or institutions. Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organisations. One of the first issues is the knowledge that we gain from research. Therefore, I completely disagree with the ideology of funding in scientific research as a better option for investment in a commercial organization.... With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. With no dearth of money, they have a greater chance at getting successful outcomes. And b ecause government funding is an important resource, it would be wiser to limit support to scientific studies with goals relevance in today's society e.g. Additionally, the competitive environment in the private sector can do wonders for the economy. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills. Due to this race of being the best, research gets highest importance and is valued the most. The government should, must, dedicate a lot more money to NASA. Government should leave it to companies to finance the research they need. View collections of IELTS Writing Samples », Book: The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+. Research pays off in the USA But Kealey`s arguments are based on examination of statistical data from … However, it is also true that a research does not need a clear … The only way an individual can progress is by having a strong and effective scientific research. Scientific research should get more public funding. This essay disagrees with this premise because the autonomous institutes have a better chance of success in this endeavour. The government should handle basic research, and industry should handle development. These arguments are dangerously wrong. Each firm experimenting with new technologies to better their products can provide various better quality and innovative products in the market. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement? I agree, scientific exploration is vital for the advancement of a country and the government is in a better position to conduct scientific studies compared to the private industries. Governments cannot turn science and technology development over to private industry yet retain the capacity at just the right moment to prevent dangerous outcomes or unintended consequences. Scientists need funding to do their work. Essay topic. The R&D investment: Invest €1. The Source of government funds is mostly from the tax paid by the general public. With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. Of course, the knowledge that the government makes funding programs available creates an expectation in industry that companies should lobby actively for government support rather than providing their own R&D funds. Government funding of scientific research should be increased and by a lot. Governments, rather than private organisations should be the only organisations responsible for funding and controlling scientific research. Some of the most influential scientific advances came out of the laboratories of … ... Another disadvantage related to this is the research process.
government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organisation